BACKGROUND: Up to 60% of errors occur in the pre-analytical stage of laboratory testing, potentially impairing clinical decision-making. This study aimed to assess pre-analytical errors using Six Sigma metrics and identify underlying causes for quality improvement. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of pre-analytical sample errors was conducted over three years in a clinical laboratory. Errors were categorized, and Sigma values were calculated to assess quality. Trends over time were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of 2,068,074 samples, 2,214 (0.107%) were rejected. The top errors were clotted blood specimens (67.34%), insufficient volumes (8.22%), and cancelled test requests (6.28%), with Sigma values of 4.42, 5.25, and 5.32, respectively. The outpatient department performed best (Sigmaâ=â5.47), while other wards required improvement. CONCLUSION: Efforts are needed to reduce specimen rejection, particularly clotted samples, to enhance laboratory quality.
Evaluation of pre-analytical specimen rejection using Six Sigma metrics: A retrospective single-center study.
阅读:4
作者:Cheng Xiuli, Yu Haimiao, Zhang Le, Zhang Biao, Wang Qin
| 期刊: | PLoS One | 影响因子: | 2.600 |
| 时间: | 2025 | 起止号: | 2025 Jun 3; 20(6):e0324840 |
| doi: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0324840 | ||
特别声明
1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。
2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。
3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。
4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。
