Absorptivity Is an Important Determinant in the Toxicity Difference between Aristolochic Acid I and Aristolochic Acid II.

阅读:16
作者:Kwok Hong-Ching, Tse Hei-Tak, Ng Ka-Ki, Wang Shuangshuang, Au Chun-Kit, Cai Zongwei, Chan Wan
Inadvertent exposure to aristolochic acids (AAs) is causing chronic renal disease worldwide, with aristolochic acid I (AA-I) identified as the primary toxic agent. This study employed chemical methods to investigate the mechanisms underlying the nephrotoxicity and carcinogenicity of AA-I. Aristolochic acid II (AA-II), which has a structure similar to that of AA-I, was investigated with the same methods for comparison. Despite their structural similarities, findings from cultured human cells and gut sac experiments showed that AA-I is absorbed more effectively than AA-II (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; p < 0.001). This increased absorption, along with the previously observed higher activity of reductive activation enzymes for AA-I, results in greater DNA damage and oxidative stress, both of which are key factors in AA-related toxicity. The similar patterns of cell mortality (34.4 ± 2.3% vs 9.7 ± 0.1% for AA-I and AA-II at 80 μM; p < 0.0001), DNA adduct formation (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; p < 0.001), and oxidative stress levels in relation to the concentrations of AA-I and AA-II indicate that the higher absorption rate of AA-I is a significant contributor to its greater toxicity. The toxicity of AA-I was also found to be further enhanced by its (natural) coexistence with AA-II. Since AA-I and AA-II differ only by a methoxy group, future research on reducing risks associated with AA exposure should focus on strategies to lower the absorption of these compounds.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。