Antiviral efficacy against and replicative fitness of an XBB.1.9.1 clinical isolate

抗病毒效果和 XBB.1.9.1 临床分离株的复制适应性

阅读:7
作者:Ryuta Uraki, Mutsumi Ito, Maki Kiso, Seiya Yamayoshi, Kiyoko Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Yuko Sakai-Tagawa, Masaki Imai, Michiko Koga, Shinya Yamamoto, Eisuke Adachi, Makoto Saito, Takeya Tsutsumi, Amato Otani, Shuetsu Fukushi, Shinji Watanabe, Tadaki Suzuki, Tetsuhiro Kikuchi, Hiroshi Yotsuyanagi, Ken Maeda

Abstract

The emergence and spread of new SARS-CoV-2 variants with mutations in the spike protein, such as the XBB.1.5 and XBB.1.9.1 sublineages, raise concerns about the efficacy of current COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In this study, none of the mAbs we tested neutralized XBB.1.9.1 or XBB.1.5, even at the highest concentration used. We also found that the bivalent mRNA vaccine could enhance humoral immunity against XBB.1.9.1, but that XBB.1.9.1 and XBB.1.5 still evaded humoral immunity induced by vaccination or infection. Moreover, the susceptibility of XBB.1.9.1 to remdesivir, molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir, and ensitrelvir was similar to that of the ancestral strain and the XBB.1.5 isolate in vitro. Finally, we found the replicative fitness of XBB.1.9.1 to be similar to that of XBB.1.5 in hamsters. Our results suggest that XBB.1.9.1 and XBB.1.5 have similar antigenicity and replicative ability, and that the currently available COVID-19 antivirals remain effective against XBB.1.9.1.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。