Epigenetic and fragment-based profiling across CDK4/6 inhibitors in first-line HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. An ancillary analysis of the MAGNETIC.1 study

针对一线 HR+/HER2- 转移性乳腺癌,对 CDK4/6 抑制剂进行表观遗传学和片段分析。MAGNETIC.1 研究的辅助分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) represent the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. However, no head-to-head randomized trials have directly compared palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. Moreover, predictive biomarkers of resistance to CDK4/6i remain largely undefined. This study aimed to evaluate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based epigenetic and fragmentomic biomarkers as potential predictors of response and resistance in patients receiving CDK4/6i. METHODS: We conducted a biomarker-driven analysis within the prospective, multicenter MAGNETIC.1 study, enrolling 149 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC treated with first-line endocrine therapy and a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and during treatment (3 and 6 months). Droplet digital PCR was used to assess ESR1 promoter methylation and ACTB fragmentomic profiles. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated, and molecular dynamics were compared between treatment groups. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 34.8 months, no statistically significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between ribociclib and palbociclib treated patients, although ribociclib was associated with numerically longer PFS and higher survival rates. At the molecular level, palbociclib treatment was characterized by transient increases in ESR1 promoter methylation at the first evaluation and a rebound in ACTB(short) fragment levels at six months relative to baseline. These dynamic patterns were not observed among patients receiving ribociclib. CONCLUSIONS: ctDNA-based methylation and fragmentomic profiling revealed exploratory, treatment specific molecular dynamics, highlighting biological differences between CDK4/6 inhibitors. These findings support the feasibility of liquid biopsy-based biomarker studies in this setting, although their potential clinical relevance remains preliminary and requires validation in larger cohorts with earlier and more granular on-treatment timepoints.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。