Practice patterns and opinions in the treatment of allergic eye disease: A survey among Indian ophthalmologists

印度眼科医生对过敏性眼病治疗的实践模式和观点:一项调查

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: Management of allergic eye disease is seldom straightforward and often challenging. We conducted an online survey to elicit opinions on the preferred practice pattern in the treatment of allergic eye disease. METHODS: An online survey questionnaire was sent to all practicing ophthalmologists using social media platforms. The respondents were asked about their clinical experience and preferred treatment in various scenarios such as mild-moderate vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC), chronic VKC, refractory VKC, steroid responders, giant papillae, and shield ulcer. Respondents were asked about the newer molecule (alcaftadine) and reservations regarding systemic immuno-suppressants and ordering allergy tests in their practice. RESULTS: Ninety - one participants responded to the survey. About 57.1% of ophthalmologists reported coming across more than 10 cases per week in their practice. The most common age group was 5-10 years (61.1%), but adult onset VKC was also reported at 41.6% (1-2 per month), 37.1% (3-5 per month), and 13.5% (more than 10 per month). The disease is perennially present (36.7%), and a mixed form has been reported by 47.8% of ophthalmologists. Dual-acting agents were preferred by 40% in mild-moderate clinical variants. Topical steroids in slow tapering dosage were preferred by 86.7% in their prescription. Tacrolimus 0.03% was preferred by 65.9% and given for at least 3 months of continuous usage by 47.6% of ophthalmologists. High-dose topical steroids were preferred for giant papillae (67.8%) and Shields ulcers (68.3%) in our survey. Supratarsal steroid injection was preferred by 50% in treating refractory VKC in our survey. CONCLUSION: Allergic eye disease is a common yet annoying disease. The signs and symptoms can vary from subtle, innocuous forms to devastating variants affecting vision and day-to-day work. This survey aims to elicit responses from clinicians spreading across different geographical areas and compares responses based on experience in practice.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。