Pathological response to pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy in ER-low vs. ER-zero breast cancer: a Swedish population-based cohort study

瑞典一项基于人群的队列研究:基于帕博利珠单抗的新辅助治疗在ER低表达乳腺癌和ER零表达乳腺癌中的病理反应

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence indicates that estrogen receptor-low (ER-low)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) may more closely resemble ER-negative (ER-zero, < 1%) rather than ER-positive disease in terms of biological and clinicopathological characteristics. In Sweden, ER-low (ER 1–9%) BC is managed as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and is thus eligible for neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. We aimed to investigate real-world pathological response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in ER-low versus ER-zero BC patients within a Swedish population-based multi-center cohort. METHODS: BC patients with indication to receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in Sweden between 2022 and 2024 were included in the study. Clinicopathological data—including pathological complete response (pCR) status, residual cancer burden (RCB) score, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) levels, and routine tumor characteristics—were retrieved from laboratory information systems. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using chi-squared (χ(2)) tests and associations between continuous variables and ER status or pCR were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U-test. RESULTS: The total cohort comprised 441 TNBC cases (ER-zero n = 398; ER-low n = 43). In the ER-zero group, the pCR rate and RCB score 0–1 were 50.5% (95% CI: 45.5% to 55.5%) and 60.8% (95% CI: 55.8% to 65.6%), respectively. In the ER-low group, the corresponding values were 58.1% (95% CI: 42.1% to 73%), and 60.5% (95% CI: 44.4% to 75%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in either pCR rate (p = 0.46) or dichotomized RCB score (p = 0.88) between the groups. The ER-low group showed significantly higher sTILs percentage compared to the ER-zero group (median sTILs 25% versus 20%, p = 0.046). However, when sTILs were analyzed as a binary categorical variable using a 30% cut-off, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: We observed no significant difference in pathological response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with pembrolizumab between ER-zero and ER-low BCs. These findings support previous evidence suggesting that ER-low tumors behave more similarly to ER-zero than ER-positive. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-025-02179-3.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。