Risk of myocardial infarction following capecitabine treatment in patients with gastrointestinal cancer - a nationwide registry-based study

卡培他滨治疗胃肠道癌症患者发生心肌梗死的风险——一项基于全国登记数据的研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) is an adverse event potentially associated with capecitabine treatment, potentially impacting the continuation of cancer therapy. However, data on its incidence remain limited. METHODS: Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer treated with capecitabine (2004–2016) and compared them to age- and sex-matched controls without cancer. Patients with prior ischemic heart disease were excluded but were subsequently analyzed as a separate secondary cohort. Cumulative incidences of MI and competing risks were calculated, and multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 23,820 patients with GI cancer treated with capecitabine and 47,640 controls without cancer were included. Differences in comorbidities and antianginal medications were not significantly different (P > 0.05 for all). At 6 months, the cumulative incidence of MI was significantly higher for patients treated with capecitabine at 0.6% (95% CI: 0.5%-0.7%) versus 0.3% (95% CI: 0.3%-0.4%) in controls, with a competing risk of death of 15.2% versus 0.7%. At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of MI for patients receiving capecitabine was 0.7% (95% CI: 0.6%-0.9%) versus 0.6% (95% CI: 0.5%-0.6%) among controls, with a competing risk for death of 29.7% versus 1.6%. After accounting for competing risks, the sub distribution hazard ratios indicated an increased risk of MI for patients receiving capecitabine compared with control subjects at both 6 months (hazard ratio: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.57–2.60; P < 0.001) and 12 months (hazard ratio: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.05–1.57; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Capecitabine treatment in GI cancer patients was associated with an increased MI risk at 6 and 12 months compared to controls, though absolute risks were low. Given the high competing mortality, the clinical relevance of this increased MI risk appears limited. In a secondary analysis of patients with known ischemic heart disease, our findings suggest that cardiovascular risk assessment and monitoring is warranted during capecitabine therapy, rather than routine avoidance of treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40959-025-00401-x.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。