Efficacy and safety of Y-3 intracalvariosseous injection versus intravenous injection in the treatment of acute large hemispheric infarction (SOLUTION-2): rationale and design of a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blind endpoint (PROBE) trial

Y-3颅内骨内注射与静脉注射治疗急性大面积半球梗死的疗效和安全性比较(SOLUTION-2):一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点(PROBE)试验的理论基础和设计

阅读:2

Abstract

RATIONALE: The blood-brain barrier (BBB) largely restricts the efficacy of neuroprotectants, which is an important approach in treating large hemispheric infarction (LHI). In this study, we harnessed intracalvariosseous (ICO) injection to bypass the BBB and facilitate drug delivery. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of ICO injection versus intravenous injection in the treatment of acute LHI within 24 hours of disease onset. METHODS AND DESIGN: The efficacy and safety of Y-3 ICO injection versus intravenous injection in the treatment of acute LHI (SOLUTION-2) is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blind endpoint trial. 134 patients with acute LHI from more than six centres will be enrolled and randomised in the trial to receive ICO or intravenous injection of Y-3 in a 1:1 ratio. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy outcome is the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-3 at 90 days after symptom onset. Primary safety outcomes include infection events related to ICO injection procedures. DISCUSSION: Results from the SOLUTION-2 trial will contribute to the understanding of the efficacy and safety of the Y-3 ICO injection in patients with LHI. TRIAL REGISTRY: The efficacy and safety of Y-3 ICO injection versus intravenous injection in the treatment of acute LHI (SOLUTION-2). URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06374667?cond=SOLUTION-2&intr=y-3&rank=1. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06374667.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。