Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) and specificity (DSp) of an agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) assay for detection of myxoma virus (MYXV) in the classical form of myxomatosis and to compare its diagnostic performance to that of molecular methods (IAC-PCR, OIE PCR, and OIE real-time PCR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A panel of MYXV-positive samples of tissue homogenates with low (1 PCR unit - PCRU) and high (3,125 PCRU) virus levels and outbreak samples were used for method comparison studies. The validation parameters of the AGID assay were assessed using statistical methods. RESULTS: The AGID attained DSe of 0.65 (CI(95%): 0.53-0.76), DSp of 1.00 (CI(95%): 0.40-1.00), and accuracy of 0.67 (CI(95%): 0.55-0.76). The assay confirmed its diagnostic usefulness primarily for testing samples containing ≥3,125 PCRU of MYXV DNA. However, in the assaying of samples containing <3,125 PCRU of the virus there was a higher probability of getting false negative results, and only molecular methods showed a 100% sensitivity for samples with low (1 PCRU) virus concentration. The overall concordance of the results between AGID and IAC-PCR was fair (ĸ = 0.40). Full concordance of the results was observed for OIE PCR and OIE real-time PCR when control reference material was analysed. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study suggest that AGID can be used with some limitations as a screening tool for detection of MYXV infections.