Comparing rumen fluid collection methods on fermentation profile and microbial population in lactating dairy cows

比较不同瘤胃液采集方法对泌乳奶牛瘤胃发酵特性和微生物群落的影响

阅读:2

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare fermentation profile and microbial diversity from rumen samples collected using a rumen cannula (RC) or stomach tube (ST) in lactating dairy cows. Three ruminally cannulated lactating dairy cows were used in a 3 × 3 Latin square design. The experimental period was 28 d and rumen fluid was collected 4 h after feeding on d 22 and 26 of each experimental period. Treatments were rumen fluid collected from the ST or RC. The pH of rumen contents was measured immediately after fluid collection and samples were analyzed for VFA, ammonia-N (NH(3)-N) concentration, and microbiome composition. Rumen pH was greater for ST compared with RC (6.88 vs. 6.25). However, NH(3)-N (15.2 vs. 10.6 mg/dL) and total VFA (121.8 vs. 95.5 mM) were greater for RC compared with ST. The rumen fluid collection methods had no effects on the molar proportion of acetate and propionate; however, the acetate-to-propionate ratio tended to increase with ST compared with RC. The majority of sequences obtained with microbiome analysis belonged to Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Cyanobacteria, regardless of the rumen fluid collection method. However, the abundance of Bacteroidetes was greater and the abundance of Firmicutes was lower for ST compared with RC. No effects were observed on the abundance of phylum Cyanobacteria. The rumen fluid collection methods had no effects on Chao1 and Shannon index. In conclusion, the molar proportion of individual VFA, Chao1, and Shannon index were similar, whereas rumen pH, NH(3)-N, and total VFA were affected by the rumen fluid collection method.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。