Comparison of imaging-based bone marrow dosimetry methodologies and their dose-effect relationships in [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT including a novel method with active marrow localization

比较基于成像的骨髓剂量测定方法及其在[(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT中的剂量-效应关系,包括一种具有主动骨髓定位的新方法

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: Establishing accurate methods for red marrow (RM) dosimetry is an important step toward patient-specific treatment guidance. We compared image-based dosimetry methods and investigated their role in predicting changes in blood counts following [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy ((177)Lu RLT). METHODS: Four image-based dosimetry methodologies were applied to patients who received 2-bed position serial (177)Lu SPECT/CT after cycle 1 of RLT, with segmentation of all spongiosa within the field-of-view performed on CT using deep learning tools. Cycle 1 RM absorbed doses (ADs) were estimated with: 1) the time-integrated activity (TIA) in segmented spongiosa coupled with MIRD-based S-values (MIRD); 2) the TIA concentration in the segmented aorta (a surrogate for blood-based dosimetry) coupled with MIRD-based S values (MIRD(aorta)); 3) the voxel-level TIA map coupled with an in-house Monte Carlo (MC) dosimetry code that incorporated a micro-scale modeling of the spongiosa (MC); and 4) a novel method that utilizes [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and [(99m)Tc]Tc-sulfur colloid (SC) SPECT/CT for tumor and marrow localization coupled with the above MC code, modified to allow tumor infiltration of the spongiosa (MC(SC+PET)). Spearman rank correlation of AD from the four methods with changes in select blood counts was evaluated. RESULTS: Imaging data was available for 20 patients for methods 1-3, while SC images were available for 12 patients for method 4. Cycle 1 AD to the FOV RM was, on average, 1.9 Gy (range: 0.1-8.0 Gy) for MIRD, 0.08 Gy (range: 0.01-0.27 Gy) for MIRD(aorta), 2.5 Gy (range: 0.1-10.3 Gy) for MC, and 1.6 Gy (range: 0.1-4.6 Gy) for MC(SC+PET). The ADs from MIRD(aorta) were not concordant with MIRD, MC, or MC(SC+PET) (|CCC|< 0.01) and were generally underestimates. For 3 patients with high bone tumor burden, MC(SC+PET) gave lower average AD than MIRD (39%) and MC (53%), potentially due to more accurate localization of marrow and tumor. Cycle 1 RM ADs were correlated with relative change in blood counts at 6-weeks post-cycle 1 with significant correlation observed for neutrophils with MIRD, MC, and MC(SC+PET) with Spearman rank correlations ranging from r = - 0.61 to r = - 0.88 (P < 0.01). Correlation with white blood cells at 6-months was also significant with r = - 0.80 (P < 0.01) for these three methods. MIRD(aorta) did not correlate with any acute or chronic changes in blood counts. CONCLUSION: The RM AD estimates from the blood-based surrogate were not concordant with the other image-based calculations and did not correlate with changes in blood values. Including patient-specific tumor and marrow distribution information resulted in lower AD for patients with a high bone metastatic burden. These findings have implications for managing hematological toxicities in (177)Lu RLT, especially if dosimetry-guided treatment planning is considered.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。