Abstract
This study aimed to explore the extent of research on developing meat and fish analogs using alternative proteins. It examined the novel and conventional technologies employed to produce these analogs and identified the primary alternative proteins that were used in their production through a systematic literature review (SLR) using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and bibliometric analysis. The SLR resulted in 46 and 13 meat and fish analog records, respectively, according to defined selection and exclusion criteria. Meat analogs are mainly produced using extrusion, followed by the novel 3D printing and mixing technology. Additionally, fish analogs are mainly produced by mixing and 3D printing. Meat analogs are mainly produced from pulses, followed by cereal, fungi, microalgae, other sources, and insects. Similarly, pulse proteins were the most used alternative protein source for the fish analogs, followed by macro- and microalgae, plant, cereal, and fungal proteins. According to keyword analysis, rheological and textural properties are essential for meat and fish analogs. This review provides up-to-date information to clarify the critical role of alternative proteins and the utilization of novel technologies in the production of meat and fish analogs. It also gives essential insights into the expected increase in studies to determine sustainability and overcome challenges related to textural, sensorial, and nutritional properties.