Comparative permeability of the blood-brain barrier to albumin, DTPA, and sucrose: effects of inflammation-induced disruption

血脑屏障对白蛋白、DTPA 和蔗糖的通透性比较:炎症诱导破坏的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruptions are increasingly recognized in a wide range of diseases and conditions, resulting in a need to detect and quantitate such disruptions. In humans, gadolinium (Gd)-labeled compounds including diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) as detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and technetium ((99m)Tc) labeled-DTPA as detected by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are commonly used, whereas (14)C-sucrose, (99m)Tc-DTPA, and radioactively labeled albumin are commonly used in animals. How these agents compare to one another and in different species has seldom been investigated, making comparisons between human and animal studies difficult. Here, we compared the three agents of radioactively labeled albumin, (99m)Tc-DTPA, and (14)C-sucrose in monolayers of human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived brain endothelial-like cells (iBECs), in control mice, and in mice whose BBB was disrupted by one or three doses of the inflammatory agent lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In iBECs, all three agents crossed with permeation dramatically decreasing as transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) increased. Permeation of sucrose and DTPA were nearly identical with albumin being 10–20 times less permeable at all levels of TEER. In mice with an intact BBB, penetration of sucrose across the BBB was 2–15 times greater than DTPA, which was about 5.5 times greater than penetration of albumin (sucrose > DTPA > albumin). Uptake was about twice baseline levels for each of these agents in the 3 dose LPS (more inflamed) mice. However, in the one dose LPS (less inflamed) mice, sucrose more readily showed BBB disruption than did DTPA and DTPA more readily showed disruption than albumin (sucrose > DTPA > albumin). Linear regression analysis showed good correlations between BBB disruption as measured between albumin and DTPA (r = 0.783) and between DTPA and sucrose (r = 0.623). However, Bland-Altman analysis showed discordance between albumin and DTPA in the mice with the greatest disruption. Bland-Altman analysis also showed that disruption to sucrose was greater at any given level of inflammation than to DTPA. These subtle differences support the view that the BBB can become disrupted in different ways and that agents, which differ in size and/or structure, may vary subtly in the type or mechanism of disruption that they measure.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。