Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease is characterized by dopamine-responsive symptoms as well as aggregation of α-synuclein protofibrils. New diagnostic methods assess α-synuclein aggregation characteristics from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and recent pathophysiologic mechanisms suggest that CSF circulation disruptions may precipitate α-synuclein retention. Here, diffusion-weighted MRI with low-to-intermediate diffusion-weightings was applied to test the hypothesis that CSF motion is reduced in Parkinson's disease relative to healthy participants. METHODS: Multi-shell diffusion weighted MRI (spatial resolution = 1.8 × 1.8 × 4.0 mm) with low-to-intermediate diffusion weightings (b-values = 0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 700, and 1000 s/mm(2)) was applied over the approximate kinetic range of suprasellar cistern fluid motion at 3 Tesla in Parkinson's disease (n = 27; age = 66 ± 6.7 years) and non-Parkinson's control (n = 32; age = 68 ± 8.9 years) participants. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were applied to test the primary hypothesis that the noise floor-corrected decay rate of CSF signal as a function of b-value, which reflects increasing fluid motion, is reduced within the suprasellar cistern of persons with versus without Parkinson's disease and inversely relates to choroid plexus activity assessed from perfusion-weighted MRI (significance-criteria: p < 0.05). RESULTS: Consistent with the primary hypothesis, CSF decay rates were higher in healthy (D = 0.00673 ± 0.00213 mm(2)/s) relative to Parkinson's disease (D = 0.00517 ± 0.00110 mm(2)/s) participants. This finding was preserved after controlling for age and sex and was observed in the posterior region of the suprasellar cistern (p < 0.001). An inverse correlation between choroid plexus perfusion and decay rate in the voxels within the suprasellar cistern (Spearman's-r=-0.312; p = 0.019) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-shell diffusion MRI was applied to identify reduced CSF motion at the level of the suprasellar cistern in adults with versus without Parkinson's disease; the strengths and limitations of this methodology are discussed in the context of the growing literature on CSF flow.