Aim
To compare the efficacy of aflibercept (Eylea®), a potent antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, with betamethasone (Celestone®) and placebo for the treatment of formed corneal neovascularization in a rabbit model.
Conclusions
In this rabbit model, corneal neovascularization induced by chemical burn failed to regress with treatment with aflibercept, betamethasone, or their combination.
Methods
A central corneal chemical burn was created in the right eye of 24 New Zealand albino rabbits. Four weeks later, the rabbits were randomly divided into 4 equal groups for subconjunctival injection of aflibercept, betamethasone, aflibercept+ betamethasone, or saline (control). Digital photographs taken at weekly intervals were rated by 2 masked observers for extent, centricity, and density of corneal neovascularization according to a predefined scale. The percentage of corneal surface involved by neovascularization was quantified by image analysis software (Fiji-J). The change in corneal neovascularization from treatment administration (4 weeks after injury) to 4 weeks later (8 weeks after injury) was assessed. The rabbits were then euthanized, and their eyes were enucleated and processed for histopathological and immunofluorescence studies.
Results
There was no significant difference in the change in corneal neovascularization after treatment among the 4 groups according to the digital images (p > 0.15) or histological evaluation with hematoxylin and eosin (p > 0.08). On immunofluorescence assay, a lower VEGF concentration was observed in all treatment groups compared to the control group. Conclusions: In this rabbit model, corneal neovascularization induced by chemical burn failed to regress with treatment with aflibercept, betamethasone, or their combination.