Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles obtain more core samples and support the shift from cytologic to histologic evaluation; however, recent studies have proposed a superior diagnostic potential for liquid-based cytology (LBC). This study compared the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided FNB histology with a 22-gauge Franseen needle (22G-FNB-H) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) LBC with a conventional 25-gauge needle (25G-FNA-LBC). METHODS: We analyzed 46 patients who underwent both 22G-FNB-H and 25G-FNA-LBC in the same lesion during the same endoscopic procedure. This study evaluated the diagnostic ability of each needle, diagnostic concordance between needles, and incremental diagnostic effect of both needles compared to using each needle alone. RESULTS: The agreement rate for malignancy between both techniques was 93.5% (kappa value = 0.82). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic ability of both methods. 22G-FNB-H and 25G-FNA-LBC provided an incremental diagnostic accuracy in two (4.3%) cases and one (2.2%) case, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the diagnostic accuracy of 25G-FNA-LBC and 22G-FNA-H for solid pancreatic lesions were comparable. A conventional 25-gauge needle that punctures lesions with ease can be used in difficult cases and according to the skill of the endoscopist.