Investigating Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implantation Disparities Through the County Health Rankings System

通过县级健康排名系统调查听力损失和人工耳蜗植入方面的差异

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the hearing loss (HL) and cochlear implantation (CI) rates of each Virginia county and correlate outcomes with the Virginia County Health Rankings (CHR) and American Community Survey (ACS) data. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study analyzing county-level HL and CI rates. SETTING: The Virginia All-Payer Claims Database (APCD) between 2016 and 2020. METHODS: We assessed county-level HL and CI rates per 100,000 for individual zip-code tabulation areas from the Virginia APCD. The relationship between county-level HL and CI rates with Virginia CHR z-scores was then correlated using a spatial lag model, while adjusting for various ACS data points. RESULTS: For the CHR, higher z-scores indicate a worse ranking and lower z-scores indicate a better ranking. Length of life z-scores were positively associated with HL rate (rate ratio [RR] = 1.70, 95% confidence interval: 1.54, 1.89, P < .01), as were social and economic factors z-scores (RR = 3.03, 95% confidence interval: 2.52, 3.65, P < .01), and clinical care z-scores (RR = 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 1.92, P = .03). Health behaviors z-scores were negatively associated with HL rate (RR = 0.66, 95% confidence interval: 0.48, 0.91, P = .01). Physical environment z-scores were negatively associated with CI rate (RR = 0.01, 95% confidence interval: <0.01, 0.53, P = .02). CONCLUSION: HL prevalence and CI in Virginia have strong associations with various CHR metrics. Physical environment factors (such as housing and transit) may help explain lower CI rates. More targeted population-level investigations are needed to further understand these associations and guide public health interventions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。