Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whether early surgery for hip fractures is effective remains controversial. The current Japanese medical system poses some constraints on conducting early surgery. We examined the usefulness of early surgery and factors that delay surgery in patients with hip fractures treated at our hospital. METHODS: Among 314 patients aged ≥60 years treated for hip fractures since January 2006, 270 patients (55 men, 215 women; mean age 84.1 years; femoral neck fracture in 111, trochanteric fracture in 159) who underwent surgery were studied. They were divided into an early surgery group (surgery up to 1 day after admission) and a delayed surgery group (later than 1 day). Clinical parameters analyzed included age, gender, pre-injury residence, pre-injury ambulatory ability, admission during public holiday, fracture site, fracture type, blood tests and urinalysis at admission, chest radiography, electrocardiography, number of systemic chronic diseases, dementia, surgical modality, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, ambulatory ability at discharge, and hospital death. After performing univariate analysis between two groups, the parameters that were identified as significant were further tested by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among 270 patients treated for hip fracture, 112 patients (41.5%) received early surgery. Multivariate analysis identified admission during public holiday, electrocardiographic abnormalities, femoral head replacement, and length of hospital stay as significant independent factors. CONCLUSION: The causes of surgical delay were admission during public holiday, electrocardiographic abnormalities, and femoral head replacement. Although length of hospital stay was shorter in patients with early surgery, there was no difference in outcome.