Abstract
Wild type (WT) animals cannot be used to objectively assess the immunogenicity of animal tissue-derived biomaterials when used as recipients due to difference with human in α-Gal expression. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences of immunological responses between the GGTA1 gene-knockout (GTKO) rabbits and WT rabbits after implantation with animal tissue-derived biomaterials. The porcine-derived decellularized bone matrix (natural bone material, NBM) and fresh porcine cancellous bone (PCB) were implanted in GTKO rabbits and WT rabbits, respectively, and sham operation was used as control (Con). At 2- and 6-week post-implantation, the related immunological items including antibody levels, serum-mediated cell lysis, cytokines, lymphocyte subtypes, and histopathological changes were assessed. GTKO rabbits exhibited more sensitive immune responses than WT rabbits after PCB implantation, resulted from a significant increase of antibodies (except total antibodies) and cytokines levels, cell lysis ratios, CD4/CD8 proportions, and inflammatory cells infiltration. Immunological factors and inflammatory cells infiltrate in GTKO rabbits after NBM implantation were significantly lower than those in the PCB group. Among the three groups, the NBM group showed the highest contents of new bone formation elements. In conclusion, the GTKO rabbit is a more sensitive alternative model than WT rabbit for preclinical study of xenografts via in situ implantation. Studies on multiple gene-edited animals are also necessary for more comprehensively evaluating xenoimmunologen risks of animal tissue-derived biomaterials in the future. Additionally, the immunogenicity of NBM was remarkably decreased compared to PCB.