Background
Iohexol is utilized for measurement of kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Until recently, there have not been available proficiency standards to assist in calibrating a laboratory's
Conclusions
For 12 URMC calibrator lots from 11/ 2006 to 3/ 2016, the factor quantifying the underestimation of measured to true iohexol concentration was 0.89. If each concentration were divided by 0.89, the calculated GFRs would be reduced by 10-11%. GFR results for CKiD were adjusted for this shift in calibration. Regular examination of iohexol proficiency testing materials, free exchange of samples among laboratories, and standardized dilution of the stock iohexol for calibration would help to bring more universal agreement to this assay.
Methods
Two batches of 30 fortified sera and patient samples from serum or heparinized plasma were sent for duplicate analysis to URMC, University of Minnesota (UMN), Mayo Clinic, and University of Lund. Five proficiency testing materials from Equalis AB were also provided. Iohexol calibration was performed using dilutions of Omnipaque™ 300 and concentrations measured by HPLC or LC-MS/MS (Mayo).
Results
UMN and Lund agreed well. URMC calibration was 11-13% lower, and Mayo was 4-8% lower for fortified samples. URMC corrected calibration was 3-8% higher for these samples. When measured values were adjusted for the results of the Equalis samples, all laboratories agreed within 1-2% on all iohexol concentrations. Conclusions: For 12 URMC calibrator lots from 11/ 2006 to 3/ 2016, the factor quantifying the underestimation of measured to true iohexol concentration was 0.89. If each concentration were divided by 0.89, the calculated GFRs would be reduced by 10-11%. GFR results for CKiD were adjusted for this shift in calibration. Regular examination of iohexol proficiency testing materials, free exchange of samples among laboratories, and standardized dilution of the stock iohexol for calibration would help to bring more universal agreement to this assay.