Glasgow Prognostic Score Serves as a Prognostic Factor of Clinical Outcome in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

格拉斯哥预后评分可作为新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者临床结局的预后因素

阅读:2

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), a systemic inflammation-based prognostic model incorporating C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum albumin levels, has been widely validated in solid tumors and several hematologic malignancies. However, its prognostic value in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between GPS and survival outcomes in NDMM patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a real-world cohort of 865 NDMM patients. Patients were stratified based on GPS, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the independent prognostic significance of GPS, adjusting for confounding factors. To compare the prognostic stratification capacity of GPS to its two modified variants, the same Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to evaluate both the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and the hypersensitivity-modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (Hs-mGPS). Quantitative comparisons utilized area under the curve (AUC) values derived from time-dependent Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A higher GPS was significantly associated with inferior OS and PFS in NDMM patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed that GPS was an independent prognostic factor after adjusting for disease stage and other clinical variables. Additionally, patients with elevated GPS scores presented with more advanced disease stages, as reflected by higher Durie-Salmon and International Staging System (ISS) classifications. And GPS exerts better prognostic stratification capacity than mGPS and Hs-mGPS. CONCLUSION: The baseline GPS at the time of diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor that negatively relates to the MM patient survival, for which GPS may serve as a supplement tool in risk stratification upon the primary medical assessment.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。