Prognostic Value of Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Combined with CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(c) Score for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Induced Cardiogenic Cerebral Embolism

血小板/淋巴细胞比值联合CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分对非瓣膜性房颤诱发心源性脑栓塞的预后价值

阅读:2

Abstract

AIM: To determine the predictive significance of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) combined with the CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(c) score for cardiogenic cerebral embolism (CCE) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). METHODS: A total of 553 patients with NVAF were included in this retrospective study. The general data, PLR, CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(c) score and echocardiography indicators were compared. The risk factors for CCE and the predictive value of PLR and CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(c) were analyzed. Stratified analysis was performed based on the cut-off value. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was utilized to build a model. The relationship between risk score and different anticoagulants was evaluated. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis showed hypertension (OR=3.95, 95% CI=2.12-7.35, p=1.40×10(-5)), diabetes mellitus (OR=2.95, 95% CI=1.57-5.58, p=7.65×10(-4)), PLR (OR=1.01, 95% CI=1.00-1.01, p<10(-6)), creatinine level (OR=1.01, 95% CI=1.00-1.02, p=7.44×10(-3)), left atrial diameter (LAD) (OR=1.90, 95% CI=1.13-3.19, p=1.51×10(-2)), ejection fraction (EF) (OR=0.93, 95% CI=0.87-0.98, p=8.06×10(-3)) and CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(c) score (OR=3.79, 95% CI=2.95-4.85, p<10(-6)) were independent risk factors for CCE. A one-way linear analysis also showed the above seven indexes were significantly correlated with CCE (F=56.4, p<10(-6)). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of PLR and CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(c) score was 0.760 (95% CI:0.721-0.800), and 0.855 (95% CI: 0.824-0.886), respectively. Pearson correlation analysis showed that PLR was correlated with CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(c) score (r=0.331, p<10(-6)). Stratified analysis indicated there was a positive correlation between different risk group (p<10(-6)). Using the LASSO model, a composite indicator displayed differential power for distinguishing CCE with an AUC value of 0.884 (95% CI: 0.857-0.911). Patients with dabigatran and rivaroxaban exhibited higher risk score than those with warfarin (warfarin vs dabigatran, p=1.40×10(-2); warfarin vs rivaroxaban p=3.00×10(-3)). CONCLUSION: PLR and CHA(2)DS(2)-VAS(c) score are independent risk factors for CCE with NVAF, and the combination of the two indices can improve the prediction of CCE.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。