Anticoagulation versus no anticoagulation after intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

房颤患者颅内出血后抗凝治疗与不抗凝治疗的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and prior intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) present a therapeutic dilemma, where stroke prevention benefits of anticoagulation must be weighed against recurrent hemorrhage risks. Existing evidence remains inconclusive due to limited sample sizes. This updated meta-analysis synthesizes data from recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether anticoagulation provides net clinical benefit in this population. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov until May 2025 for RCTs comparing anticoagulation versus no anticoagulation in AF patients with prior ICH. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were ischemic stroke and recurrent ICH, respectively, with secondary outcomes of major adverse ischemic events (composite of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction), all-cause mortality, and major bleeding. Pooled effect estimates (hazard ratios or risk ratios) with confidence intervals. Number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) were also estimated to provide clinical context. RESULTS: Five RCTs with 733 patients (371 in the anticoagulation group and 362 in the no anticoagulation group) were included. Anticoagulation therapy demonstrated an 80% reduction in ischemic stroke risk (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06-0.71; NNT = 9) and a 64% reduction in major adverse ischemic events (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20-0.64, NNT = 11) while showing a nearly four-fold increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (HR 3.69, 95% CI 1.54-8.84; NNH = 24) and a significantly increased risk of major bleeding (HR 2.40, 95% CI 1.20-4.81; NNH = 23). No significant difference was observed for all-cause mortality between groups (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.80-1.72; NNH = 177). CONCLUSION: Anticoagulation in AF patients with prior ICH shows clinically meaningful reductions in thromboembolic events but significantly increases bleeding risks in this population. The balance between efficacy and safety underscores the need for individualized patient selection.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。