Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: A three-dimensional (3D) printed tracheostomy tube has potential application for patients who require a specialized tube. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of various 3D printing materials and determine their use in producing 3D-printed tracheostomy tube. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mechanical, chemical, and microbiological in vivo changes in the scaffolds were analyzed using a hamster cheek pouch (HCP) model. RESULTS: The poly methyl methacylate (PMMA)-resin showed superior pre- and post-insertion mechanical properties and a relatively consistent lower biofilm formation compared with other scaffolds. PMMA-resin was successfully 3D-printed with dimensional accuracy without a support system. The use of a 3D-printed PMMA tracheostomy tube in a rabbit trachea showed no definite signs of infection, allergy or foreign body reaction. CONCLUSION: PMMA-resin can be proposed as an alternative for a 3D-printed tracheostomy tube material. In addition, we suggest HCPs as an in vivo model for evaluating indwelling medical devices.