A Pathological Study Using 2014 WHO Criteria Reveals Poor Prognosis of Grade 3 Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinomas

一项采用2014年世界卫生组织标准的病理学研究揭示了3级卵巢子宫内膜样癌预后不良。

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical behavior of several grades of endometrioid carcinoma (EC) compared to high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), based on World Health Organization 2014 criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinicopathological features were compared between all grades of EC and HGSC, and between HGSC and either grade 1/2 or grade 3 EC. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with EC and 214 with HGSC were identified. Among patients with EC, 56 displayed 1/2 EC and nine had grade 3 EC. The progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival of patients with grade 1/2 EC were better than of those of patients with HGSC; however, PFS and OS did not statistically differ between patients with grade 3 EC and those with HGSC. Grade 1/2 EC, but not grade 3, was a better prognostic factor compared with HGSC. CONCLUSION: A grading system for EC would be beneficial for the accurate prognosis of ovarian cancer.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。