Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current standard for motion capture data collection in baseball biomechanics is marker-based optical motion capture. Recent advancement in markerless motion capture capabilities has greatly improved accessibility to in-game, high-precision motion capture data, but specific values may differ from markered systems, necessitating separate normative values. For future data comparison, reference data are needed. PURPOSE: To describe common kinematic variables in baseball pitching using an in-game markerless motion capture system. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Kinematic data were collected in 2 collegiate stadiums in the National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Southeastern Conference using 8 synchronized 300-Hz KinaTrax cameras placed around the playing field. The in-game biomechanics data of 51 pitchers from 5 different teams during the 2023 season were collected; only pitchers with >3 outings during the season were included. After averaging all available fastballs thrown in the first inning of a game, we analyzed triaxial trunk (rotation, flexion, and lean) and pelvic rotation angles in the global reference frame, as well as shoulder rotation, shoulder horizontal abduction, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, stride knee flexion, and hip-shoulder separation. RESULTS: A total of 509 fastballs were analyzed. Mean fastball velocity was 40.98 m/s (91.5 mph), with a vertical break of 42.0 ± 10.6 cm (16.5 ± 4.2 inches) and a horizontal break of 28.0 ± 11.1 cm (11.0 ± 4.4 inches). Mean stride length was 1.41 ± 0.08 m. The mean arm slot was 59.4°± 9.3°, and the mean upper arm slot was 72.9°± 9.3° at ball release. Additional normative time-series data are presented for commonly analyzed variables, and discrete metrics are provided at distinct time points in the pitching cycle. CONCLUSION: These data fill a need for separate norms for in-game, markerless motion capture performance metrics, and biomechanics for collegiate baseball pitchers to be used as reference values for researchers, coaches, and clinicians. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should use these results as reference values to contextualize injury mechanisms and the injury-performance trade-off. These data will also educate clinicians on what athletes' bodies must do to perform when constructing plans of care and return-to-play timelines.