Comparison of anterior segment measurements using Sirius Topographer(®) and Nidek Axial Length-Scan(®) with assessing repeatability in patients with cataracts

比较使用 Sirius Topographer® 和 Nidek Axial Length-Scan® 测量前节数据,并评估其在白内障患者中的重复性

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate anterior segment measurements obtained using CSO Sirius Topographer(®) (CSO, Firenze, Italy) and Nidek Axial Length (AL)-Scan(®) (Nidek CO., Gamagori, Japan). METHODS: A total of 43 eyes of 43 patients were included in this prospective study. The central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), white-to-white distance (WTW), flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), and mean keratometry (K) values were randomly measured three times with each device by the same examiner. The intraclass correlation coefficient of repeatability was analyzed. The compatibility of both devices was evaluated using the 95% limits of the agreement proposed by Bland and Altman. RESULTS: Examiner achieved high repeatability for all parameters on each device except the WTW measured by Sirius. All measurements except WTW and K1 taken with the Sirius were higher than that taken with the Nidek AL-Scan(®). The difference in CCT, ACD, and WTW values was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: High repeatability of the measurements was achieved on both devices. Although Km, K1, and K2 measurements of the Sirius and the AL-Scan(®) showed good agreement, WTW, CCT, and ACD measurements significantly differed between two devices. Thus, anterior segment measurements except for Km, K1, and K2 cannot be used interchangeably between Sirius and Nidek AL-Scan(®) devices.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。