Transcranial magnetic stimulation-based closed-loop modality for activity of daily living gain in spinal cord injury: a retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis

经颅磁刺激闭环模式改善脊髓损伤患者日常生活活动能力:一项采用倾向评分匹配分析的回顾性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-based closed-loop (TBCL) modality was seldom recommended for functional restoring following spinal cord injury (SCI), several studies recently came to a positive suggestion. AIM: To explore the independent factors which influence activity of daily living (ADL) gain, and systematically investigate the efficacy of TBCL for ADL gain. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. SETTING: The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. POPULATION: SCI patients with neurological dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 768 patients who received TBCL (N.=548) or sole rehabilitation (SR, N.=220) were enrolled. Analysis on propensity score matching was also performed. Finally, the cumulative inefficiencies between TBCL and SR within entire patient population, matched-patients as well as subgroup on per SCI clinical characteristics were performed. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that thoracolumbar injury, single/double injury, incomplete injury, no neurogenic bladder, no neurogenic intestinal and no respiratory disorder, as well as TBCL strategy were independent positive factors for ADL gain. Meanwhile, TBCL strategy was the outstanding positive factor. TBCL caused a lower cumulative inefficiency over SR at 1, 90 and 180 days (83.2% vs. 86.8%, 54.0% vs. 63.6%, and 38.3% vs. 50.9%, respectively; all P<0.05). Propensity matching also found TBCL caused a lower cumulative inefficiency over SR after 1, 90 and 180 days (82.4% vs. 86.4%, 51.1% vs. 62.5%, and 33.5% vs. 49.4%, respectively; all P<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that TBCL caused a greater ADL gain regardless of injured site, segments of injury and injured extent, as well as whether concurrent with neurogenic bladder, neurogenic intestinal and respiratory disorder (all P<0.05). Further, TBCL was more effective in 180-days overall ADL gain within each subgroup (all P<0.05), except the subgroup whether concurrent with respiratory disorder (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that TBCL strategy was the most outstanding independent positive factors for ADL gain. Further, TBCL is a better choice than SR in ADL gain for SCI-relevant neurological dysfunctions in case of adequate stimuli distance and individual temperature, regardless of discrepancy of clinical feature. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: This study helps to improve everyday management for rehabilitative intervention on SCI. For another thing, the present study may be good for neuromodulation practice on function restoring in SCI rehabilitation clinics.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。