Abstract
Air space proportion (ASP), the volume fraction in bone that is occupied by air, is frequently applied as a measure for quantifying the extent of skeletal pneumaticity in extant and fossil archosaurs. Nonetheless, ASP estimates rely on a key assumption: that the soft tissue mass within pneumatic bones is negligible, an assumption that has rarely been explicitly acknowledged or tested. Here, we provide the first comparisons between estimated air space proportion (where the internal cavity of a pneumatic bone is assumed to be completely air-filled) and true air space proportion (ASPt, where soft tissues present within the internal cavities of fresh specimens are considered). Using birds as model archosaurs exhibiting postcranial skeletal pneumaticity, we find that estimates of ASPt are significantly lower than estimates of ASP, raising an important consideration that should be acknowledged in investigations of the evolution of skeletal pneumaticity and bulk skeletal density in extinct archosaurs, as well as in volume-based estimates of archosaur body mass. We advocate for the difference between ASP and ASPt to be explicitly acknowledged in studies seeking to quantify the extent of skeletal pneumaticity in extinct archosaurs, to avoid the risk of systematically overestimating the volume fraction of pneumatic bones composed of air.This article is part of the theme issue 'The biology of the avian respiratory system'.