Abstract
Thyroid paraganglioma is a rare disorder that sometimes poses problems in differential diagnosis with medullary thyroid carcinoma. So far, differential diagnosis is solved with the help of some markers that are frequently expressed in medullary thyroid carcinoma (thyroid transcription factor 1, calcitonin, and carcinoembryonic antigen). However, some of these markers are not absolutely specific of medullary thyroid carcinoma and may be expressed in other tumors. Here we report 3 new cases of thyroid paraganglioma and describe our strategy to design a diagnostic immunohistochemical battery. First, we performed a comparative analysis of the expression profile of head and neck paragangliomas and medullary thyroid carcinoma, obtained after complementary DNA array analysis of 2 series of fresh-frozen samples of paragangliomas and medullary thyroid carcinoma, respectively. Seven biomarkers showing differential expression were selected (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase 1 alpha subcomplex, 4-like 2, NDUFA4L2; cytochrome c oxidase subunit IV isoform 2; vesicular monoamine transporter 2; calcitonin gene-related protein/calcitonin; carcinoembryonic antigen; and thyroid transcription factor 1) for immunohistochemical analysis. Two tissue microarrays were constructed from 2 different series of paraffin-embedded samples of paragangliomas and medullary thyroid carcinoma. We provide a classifying rule for differential diagnosis that combines negativity or low staining for calcitonin gene-related protein (histologic score, <10) or calcitonin (histologic score, <50) together with positivity of any of NADH dehydrogenase 1 alpha subcomplex, 4-like 2; cytochrome c oxidase subunit IV isoform 2; or vesicular monoamine transporter 2 to predict paragangliomas, showing a prediction error of 0%. Finally, the immunohistochemical battery was checked in paraffin-embedded blocks from 4 examples of thyroid paraganglioma (1 previously reported case and 3 new cases), showing also a prediction error of 0%. Our results suggest that the comparative expression profile, obtained by complementary DNA arrays, seems to be a good tool to design immunohistochemical batteries used in differential diagnosis.