Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of single-shot echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging with compressed SENSE (EPICS-DWI) for pancreas assessment by comparing with single-shot echo planar DWI with parallel imaging (PI-DWI). METHODS: This multicenter prospective study included 27 consecutive participants with untreated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (15 men; mean age, 67 ± 10 years) who underwent pancreatic protocol MRI including both PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI. Two radiologists independently and randomly reviewed the high b-value DWI images and qualitatively assigned confidence scores for overall image quality, image noise, pancreas conspicuity, and PDAC conspicuity using a 5-point scale. One radiologist measured the PDAC-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) on high b-value DWI images and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of PDAC. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were compared between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The confidence scores for overall image quality (P < 0.001 in both radiologists) and image noise (P < 0.001 in both radiologists) were higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI. The pancreas conspicuity was better in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI in one of the radiologists (P = 0.02 and 0.06). The PDAC conspicuity was comparable between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI (P > 0.99 in both radiologists). The PDAC-to-pancreas CNR was higher in EPICS-DWI than in PI-DWI (P = 0.02), while the ADC value of PDAC in PI-DWI was not significantly different compared to that in EPICS-DWI (P = 0.48). CONCLUSION: The image quality and PDAC-to-pancreas CNR was improved in EPICS-DWI compared to PI-DWI. However, the conspicuity and ADC value of PDAC were comparable between PI-DWI and EPICS-DWI.