Abstract
Telehealth has been widely accepted as an alternative to in-person primary care. This study examines whether the quality of primary care delivered via telehealth is equitable for older adults across racial and ethnic boundaries in provider-shortage urban settings. The study analyzed documentation of the 4Ms components (What Matters, Mobility, Medication, and Mentation) in relation to self-reported racial and ethnic backgrounds of 254 Medicare Advantage enrollees who used telehealth as their primary care modality in Southern Nevada from July 2021 through June 2022. Results revealed that Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders had significantly less documentation in What Matters (OR = 0.39, 95%, p = .04) and Blacks had significantly less documentation in Mobility (OR = 0.35, p < .001) compared to their White counterparts. The Hispanic ethnic group had less documentation in What Matters (OR = 0.18, p < .001) compared to non-Hispanic ethnic groups. Our study reveals equipping the geriatrics workforce merely with the 4Ms framework may not be sufficient in mitigating unconscious biases healthcare providers exhibit in the telehealth primary care setting in a provider shortage area, and, by extrapolation, in other care settings across the spectra, whether they be in-person or virtual.