Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a potentially life-threatening respiratory tract infection. Many Early Warning Scores (EWS) were developed to detect patients with high risk for adverse clinical outcomes, but few have explored the utility of these EWS for pneumonia patients in the Emergency Department (ED) setting. We aimed to compare the prognostic utility of A-DROP, NEWS2, and REMS in predicting in-hospital mortality and the requirement for mechanical ventilation among ED patients with pneumonia. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the ED of Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. Adult patients diagnosed with non-COVID-19 pneumonia between June 1, 2021, and May 31, 2022, were included. We calculated and analyzed their EWS at ED arrival. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: We enrolled 735 patients; 272 (37%) died at hospital discharge, and 75 (10.2%) required mechanical ventilation. A-DROP had the highest discrimination capacity for in-hospital mortality (AUROC: 0.698, 95% CI 0.659-0.737) compared to NEWS2 (AUROC 0.657; 95%CI 0.617, 0.698) and REMS (AUROC 0.637; 95%CI 0.596, 0.678). A-DROP also had superior performances than NEWS2 and REMS in terms of calibration, overall model performance, and balanced diagnostic accuracy indices at its optimal cut point (A-DROP ≥ 2). No EWS could perform well in predicting mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: A-DROP had the highest prognostic utility for predicting in-hospital mortality in non-COVID-19 pneumonia patients in the ED compared to NEWS2 and REMS.