Abstract
The Cre/Lox system has revolutionized the ability of biomedical researchers to ask very specific questions about the function of individual genes in specific cell types at specific times during development and/or disease progression in a variety of animal models. This is true in the skeletal biology field, and numerous Cre driver lines have been created to foster conditional gene manipulation in specific subpopulations of bone cells. However, as our ability to scrutinize these models increases, an increasing number of issues have been identified with most driver lines. All existing skeletal Cre mouse models exhibit problems in one or more of the following three areas: (1) cell type specificity-avoiding Cre expression in unintended cell types; (2) Cre inducibility-improving the dynamic range for Cre in inducible models (negligible Cre activity before induction and high Cre activity after induction); and (3) Cre toxicity-reducing the unwanted biological effects of Cre (beyond loxP recombination) on cellular processes and tissue health. These issues are hampering progress in understanding the biology of skeletal disease and aging, and consequently, identification of reliable therapeutic opportunities. Skeletal Cre models have not advanced technologically in decades despite the availability of improved tools, including multi-promoter-driven expression of permissive or fragmented recombinases, new dimerization systems, and alternative forms of recombinases and DNA sequence targets. We review the current state of skeletal Cre driver lines, and highlight some of the successes, failures, and opportunities to improve fidelity in the skeleton, based on successes pioneered in other areas of biomedical science.