Study on Multifactor Regulation Mechanism and Priority of Gas Desorption in Soft Coal

软煤中气体解吸的多因素调控机制及优先性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

Under the background of global energy low-carbon transformation, coalbed methane (CBM) reserves in soft coal-rich areas such as China's Shanxi Qinshui Basin account for over 30% of the national total, yet the extraction efficiency has long been below 35%. The core bottleneck lies in insufficient understanding of the mechanisms by which multiple factors (e.g., temperature, moisture content, particle size, and initial pressure) regulate gas desorption, coupled with the lack of quantitative comparison and priority ranking. Taking soft coal from a coal mine in Shanxi Province, China, as the research object, this study conducted 16 groups of single-factor experiments (temperature: 10-40 °C, moisture content: 2%-8%, particle size: 0.3-4.0 mm, initial pressure: 1-4 MPa). Combined with high-precision monitoring and a quantitative evaluation system of "curve separation degree-peak rate range-attenuation constant range", the regulation laws, mechanisms, and priority order were revealed. Results show that initial pressure is the absolute dominant factor: the cumulative desorption amount at 4 MPa is 5.5 times that at 1 MPa, with a 6-fold difference in peak desorption rate. It determines gas reserves and desorption driving force through Langmuir adsorption equilibrium and pressure difference. Moisture content is a key inhibitory factor: the desorption amount at 8% decreases by 68.55% compared to 2%, showing a sharp decline in the 2%-4% range and a slow decline in the 4%-8% range, attributed to pore blockage and adsorption competition. Temperature is an auxiliary promoting factor: the desorption amount at 40 °C increases by 40% compared to 10 °C, regulating desorption by breaking adsorption equilibrium via Le Chatelier's principle and accelerating molecular thermal motion, but is constrained by moisture content. Particle size has the weakest impact: the difference in final desorption amount between coal samples of 0.3-0.5 mm and 2.0-4.0 mm is less than 5%, only assisting in regulating the initial rate. Quantitative comparison establishes the priority order: initial pressure > moisture content > temperature > particle size. This study fills the gap in quantitative comparison of multifactor effects, provides support for precise gas control strategies of ″pre-extraction pressure control-drainage dehumidification-temperature control assistance-local coal fragmentation", and is of great significance for improving CBM development efficiency and preventing gas disasters.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。