Abstract
Despite the growing concerns about the replicability of ecological and evolutionary studies, no results exist from a field-wide replication project. We conduct a large-scale in silico replication project, leveraging cutting-edge statistical methodologies. Replicability is 30%-40% for studies with marginal statistical significance in the absence of selective reporting, whereas the replicability of studies presenting 'strong' evidence against the null hypothesis H(0) is >70%. The former requires a sevenfold larger sample size to reach the latter's replicability. We call for a change in planning, conducting and publishing research towards a transparent, credible and replicable ecology and evolution.