Evaluation of functional outcome between cemented and uncemented total hip replacement

评估有骨水泥型和非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术的功能结果

阅读:1

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty is an effective procedure for improving mobility and quality of life, but the comparative functional outcomes of cemented and uncemented techniques remain debated. In this prospective randomised study of 50 patients divided into two equal groups, clinical and radiological assessments were performed preoperatively and at regular intervals up to 4 years. Cemented THR demonstrated superior early outcomes, with significantly better pain relief and Harris Hip Scores at 6 weeks and 3 months. By 6 months, functional outcomes between cemented and uncemented THRs converged, with both groups achieving good-to-excellent results and minimal complications. Cemented implants provide faster early recovery, while the long-term advantages of uncemented implants require further investigation to guide individualised implant selection.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。