Microbiological and Clinical Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Chemical Desiccant Agent in Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

化学干燥剂在非手术牙周治疗中疗效的微生物学和临床评价:一项随机对照临床试验

阅读:1

Abstract

Background: This randomized clinical trial compared the effects of topical irrigation with a desiccant agent (HybenX Oral Tissue Decontaminant, HBX) combined with full-mouth ultrasonic debridement as well as scaling and root planing (FMUD-SRP) versus conventional non-surgical periodontal therapy (US-SRP). Methods: Three quadrants per patient with probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 5 mm were randomly assigned to (i) the control group (US-SRP only), (ii) test group 1 (HBX + US-SRP at baseline, HBX 1T (one time)), or (ii) test group 2 (HBX + US-SRP across three sessions, HBX 3T (three times)). Clinical parameters included probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), gingival recession (REC), and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL), recorded at baseline (Tbase), 45 days (T45d), and 90 days (T90d). Microbiological sampling was conducted for all sites at Tbase, T45d, and T90d to assess periodontal pathogens. HBX-treated sites received gel application for 60 s, followed by a saline rinse and US-SRP. Results: Significant differences were found between groups in PPD (p = 0.04) and CAL (p = 0.02) at T45d versus Tbase, while BOP, PI, and REC showed no significant inter-group differences at T45d. The HBX 3T group demonstrated greater pathogen reduction compared to the control and HBX 1T groups, except for one bacterial species. Conclusions: All treatments improved clinical and microbiological parameters. Even if single and triple applications of HBX showed similar clinical results, the repeated application achieved greater bacterial reduction.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。