The Young European Resuscitation Council - A catalyst for the next generation of the resuscitation community

欧洲青年复苏委员会——下一代复苏界的催化剂

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has become one of the most crucial therapeutic pillars in modern CIED management. Very old pacemaker and defibrillator leads are known to be risk factors for procedural complications in patients undergoing TLE. AIM & METHODS: Aim of this study was to analyze patients with very old leads undergoing TLE. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients in the GALLERY with at least one lead aged ≥10 years and compared them to a cohort of patients with leads aged <10 years, in terms of baseline- and lead characteristics, as well as procedural outcomes and potential predictors of adverse events. RESULTS: We identified 858 patients with at least one lead aged ≥10 years (Group A) and 1666 patients with leads aged <10 years (Group B). Patients in Group A were older (70.4±13.7 vs. 66.7±13.7; p<0.001) and were less likely to exhibit highly reduced LVEF (18.5 vs. 30.0%, p<0.001) or coronary artery disease (36.1 vs. 46.4%, p<0.001), compared to Group B. The mean numbers of leads per patient were 2.5±1.1 and 2.4±1.0, respectively (p<0.001) with median ages of the oldest indwelling lead of 161.5 [137-206.75] and 72.0 [48-94] months (p<0.001). Patients in Group A had higher proportions of right-sided (47.7 vs. 25.8%, p<0.001) and abandoned leads (41.3 vs. 23.4%, p<0.001). Median procedural time was longer in Group A with 93.5 [63-145] vs. 75 [52-116] minutes (p<0.001) with an increased necessity for additional tools for extraction (12.6 vs. 3.4%, p<0.001). Overall (5.5 vs. 3.6%, p=0.03) and major complication rates (3.2 vs. 1.4%, p=0.005) were both higher in Group A. Patients in Group A were less likely to achieve complete procedural success rate (84.3 vs. 95.1%, p<0.001) and had a higher rate for procedural failure (3.5 vs. 1.5%, p=0.002). There was no difference in procedure-related <(0.7 vs. 0.5%, p=0.592) or all-cause mortality (3.5 vs. 3.2%, p=0.711) between groups. Multivariate analysis in Group A revealed the presence of abandoned leads (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.0-3.4, p=0.049), female sex (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.2-3.9, p=0.013) and systemic infection (OR:1.89, 95%CI: 1.0-3.5, p=0.039) as predictors for procedural complications. The use of additional extraction tools (OR:4.4, 95%CI:2.0-9.7, p<0.001) and a BMI≥35 kg/m2 (OR:4.4, 95%CI:1.4-14.0, p=0.012) were identified as risk factors for procedural failure. Procedural complications (OR:5.2, 95%CI:2.0-13.7, p<0.001) and systemic infection (OR:18.7, 95%CI: 5.6-62.9, p>0.001) were highly predictive for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with leads aged ≥10 years undergoing TLE suffer from more procedural complications, more often require additional extraction tools and have lower rates for complete procedural success, but do not show any differences in mortality, when compared to patients with leads aged <10 years. The necessity of additional tools for extraction and a BMI≥35 kg/m2 were identified as predictors for procedural failure.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。