Effects of Remimazolam and Propofol on Ca2+ Regulation by Ryanodine Receptor 1 with Malignant Hyperthermia Mutation

We investigated the potential safety of remimazolam and propofol in malignant hyperthermia- (HM-) susceptible patients using ryanodine receptor 1- (RYR1-) expressing human embryonic kidney- (HEK-) 293 cells.

The increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration caused by remimazolam or propofol was not considered an RYR1-mediated reaction. We conclude that remimazolam and propofol can be safely used as an anesthetic in MH-susceptible patients with RYR1-mutation without causing MH and may be safely substituted for an MH-triggering anesthetic when RYR1-mediated MH occurs.

We compared the enhanced responsiveness of HEK-293 cells expressing wild-type RYR1 with that of mutant RYR1 to caffeine following perfusion with remimazolam or propofol. Furthermore, we investigated whether RYR1 enhanced the responsiveness of cells to remimazolam or propofol and compared the median effective concentration (EC50; i.e., the concentration required to reach half-maximal activation) using an unpaired two-tailed t-test while a P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Remimazolam and propofol did not promote the caffeine-induced increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels in HEK-293 cells expressing mutant RYR1 even with exposure to approximately 100-fold the clinically used concentration. In wild-type RYR1, EC50 values of remimazolam following refusion vs. nonperfusion were 2.86 mM vs. 2.75 mM (P = 0.76) while for propofol perfusion vs. nonperfusion, they were 2.76 mM vs. 2.75 mM, respectively (P = 0.83). In mutant RYR1, EC50 values of remimazolam refusion vs. nonperfusion were 1.58 mM vs. 1.71 mM, respectively (P = 0.63) while for propofol perfusion vs. nonperfusion, they were 1.65 mM vs. 1.71 mM, respectively (P = 0.73). Remimazolam and propofol increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in a concentration-dependent manner, but the effect was not enhanced by RYR1. EC50 values of remimazolam with non-RYR1 vs. wild-type RYR1 were 1.00 mM vs. 0.92 mM, respectively (P = 0.91) while those of propofol were 1.09 mM vs. 1.05 mM, respectively (P = 0.84). Conclusions: The increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration caused by remimazolam or propofol was not considered an RYR1-mediated reaction. We conclude that remimazolam and propofol can be safely used as an anesthetic in MH-susceptible patients with RYR1-mutation without causing MH and may be safely substituted for an MH-triggering anesthetic when RYR1-mediated MH occurs.