A noteworthy issue: microbiome data variation depending on sampling methods in skin microecology studies in acne vulgaris patients

一个值得关注的问题:寻常痤疮患者皮肤微生态学研究中微生物组数据会因采样方法的不同而存在差异

阅读:2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Skin microecology significantly affects health, with the microbiome being a complex community of microorganisms. Different niche preferences of microorganisms raise concerns about the adequacy of common sampling methods like swabbing and cyanoacrylate biopsy. In this study, we aim to contribute to a more suitable sampling strategy in acne microbiome studies. METHODS: This study involved ten mild to moderate acne patients. Three sampling methods were used: swab sampling (S1), modified standardized skin surface biopsy (S2), and individual comedo extraction (S3). DNA was extracted and sequenced to analyze the microbiome data. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the bacterial and fungal microbiome data obtained by the three different sampling methods. Staphylococcus spp. (significantly higher in S3, P<0.05) and Malassezia spp. (higher in S3, P<0.05) were most affected by sampling methods. Bacterial phyla Proteobacteria (abundant in S1) and Bacteroidota (dominant in S2) also showed method-dependent variations. CONCLUSION: The choice of sampling method significantly impacts microbiome data, highlighting the need for accurate sampling to understand the relationship between the skin microbiome and acne. Standardizing sampling methods in future studies is essential for advancing skin microecology research. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR-CPC-17012398.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。