Impact of Low-Volume, Low-Pressure Tracheostomy Cuffs on Acute Mucosal Injury in Swine

低容量、低压气管切开套管对猪急性黏膜损伤的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Tapered low-volume, low-pressure (LVLP) cuffs have been introduced to improve sealing and reduce injury from tracheostomy and endotracheal intubation compared to traditional cylindrical high-volume, low-pressure (HVLP) cuffs. The objective of this study is to develop a swine model of tracheostomy injury and to compare live tissue response following LVLP and HVLP tracheostomy placement. STUDY DESIGN: In vivo animal study. SETTING: Academic institution. METHODS: Swine underwent tracheostomy followed by placement of LVLP and HVLP tracheostomy cuffs at 30 cm H(2)O. After 24 and 48 hours, tracheal specimens underwent histopathological analysis including cilia, lamina propria and epithelial thickness, and mucosal injury score. RESULTS: In all cuff contact areas, mean epithelial thickness for both tracheostomy cohorts was decreased compared to control epithelium at 24 and 48 hours (P < .01). HVLP proximal epithelium thickness was decreased at 24 and 48 hours relative to LVLP sections (P < .05). Lamina propria thickness in proximal LVLP sections was less than HVLP sections at 24 hours and 48 hours (P < .05). Mucosal injury score at areas of cuff contact was increased in tracheostomy cohorts relative to controls (P < .001), with HVLP injury score greater than LVLP at the proximal cuff (P < .05). CONCLUSION: In a swine model, tracheostomy resulted in increased mucosal injury compared to normal tracheal mucosa. LVLP cuffs resulted in less injury than HVLP cuffs, with reduced mucosal inflammation and improved health of epithelium and lamina propria. The wider proximal LVLP cuff demonstrated improved mucosal health compared to the HVLP cylindrical cuff.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。