Heparin-Binding Protein Promotes Acute Lung Injury in Sepsis Mice by Blocking the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Signaling Pathway

肝素结合蛋白通过阻断芳基烃受体信号通路促进脓毒症小鼠急性肺损伤

阅读:9
作者:Kun Ye, Xiang Lin, Tai-Zhi Chen, Long-Hui Wang, Sheng-Xing Liu

Conclusion

HBP downregulation in lung tissues significantly improved LPS-induced lung injury and the pulmonary inflammatory response, thereby prolonging the survival of sepsis mice, suggesting activation of the AhR signaling pathway. Moreover, the effect of lowering the HBP level was equivalent to that of the classical antibiotic CEF.

Methods

We utilized a murine model of sepsis-induced by intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in C57BL/6J mice divided into four groups: Control, LPS, Anti-HBP, and ceftriaxone (CEF). Following sepsis induction, Anti-HBP or CEF treatments were administered, and survival rates were monitored for 48 h. We then used reverse-transcription quantitative PCR to analyze the expression levels of HBP in lung tissues, immunohistochemistry for protein localization, and Western blotting for protein quantification. Pulmonary inflammation was assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays of proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-6, and interferon-γ). The activation state of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signaling pathway was determined via Western blotting, evaluating both cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of AhR and the expression of cytochrome P450 1A1 protein by its target gene.

Purpose

This study aimed to explore the therapeutic effect and potential mechanism of heparin-binding protein (HBP) reduction on sepsis-related acute lung injury.

Results

Anti-HBP specifically reduced HBP levels. The survival rate of mice in the Anti-HBP and CEF groups was much higher than that in the LPS group. The severity of lung injury and pulmonary inflammatory response in the Anti-HBP and CEF groups was significantly lower than that in the LPS group. AhR signaling pathway activation was observed in the Anti-HBP and CEF groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the above indices between the Anti-HBP and CEF groups.

Trial registration

Not applicable.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。