PSUN25 Adrenal Incidentaloma: Is Interval Hormone Testing Warranted?

PSUN25 肾上腺偶发瘤:是否需要进行间隔激素检测?

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma (AI) is increasing, with pressure on healthcare systems. While earlier guidelines recommended repeat endocrine testing to ensure stability, the recent European guidelines suggest that is not necessary if initial tests were reassuring. AIM: To explore the utility of this guidance on repeat endocrine testing of AI. METHODS: Retrospective unselected review of AI cases reviewed before the European guidelines, based on local protocol (baseline overnight dexaethasone suppression test [ONDST] and plasma metanephrines +/- aldosterone: renin ratio [ARR] if hypertension or hypokalemia were present). At two years, the endocrine tests were repeated. We compared the baseline with the two-year follow-up data. RESULTS: We collected data on 54 patients initially identified (2011-2016). Post-ONDST cortisol (nmol/L): At baseline, 37/52 (71.1%), 12/52 (23.1%) and 3/52 (5.8%) had values <50, 51-138 and >138 respectively. After 2 years, 20/28 (71.4%) had results of <50, of which 18 were originally <50 and 2 were 51-138. The remaining 8 had values of 51-138, of which 6 had values of <50 at baseline and the other 2 had values of 51-138. Where there appeared some discordance, analysis of agreement (kappa statistics) showed an agreement of 71% (P=0.153). Wilcoxon signed-rank test to explore changes in the raw cortisol values showed that there was no significant difference (P=0.281). ARR: Data was available data on 40 patients, all of whom had normal ARR results. At 2 years there were data on 25 cases, 19 of which also had baseline values, while 6 had 2-year values but no baseline data. In all cases, 2-year ARR values were normal. Plasma metanephrines: Metanephrine: Data was available at baseline on 43 patients, with 8 (18.6%) having values above the reference range (>0.33 nmol/L). Of these 8, 7 had values between 0.33 and 0.46, with the remaining one having a single markedly raised value at 206.8 nmol/L. At 2 years, we had data on 23 of these 43 patients, out of whom 20 had normal levels at both baseline and 2 years, 2 had abnormal results at baseline but normal at 2 years and one normal baseline value but slightly raised (0.36 nmol/L) at two years, with normal normetanephrines (0.33 nmol/L). Normetanephrine: Of the 43 cases with baseline results, only one was abnormal at 802 nmol/L (the same patient with a plasma metanephrine of 206.8 nmol/L). In this case, the normetanephrine became unremarkable after 2 years indicative of successful surgery. The remaining 22 cases with data at 2 years all had values within the reference range. CONCLUSION: There was no significant change in function after two-year follow up, as defined by abnormal endocrine test results. Therefore, our findings support the European guidelines advice that repeat testing is not warranted. Presentation: Sunday, June 12, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。