Comparative Evaluation of Bilateral Earlobe Cleft Repair with and Without Platelet Rich Plasma Injection- In vivo Randomized Study

双侧耳垂裂修复术中应用富血小板血浆注射与不应用富血小板血浆注射的比较评价——体内随机研究

阅读:3

Abstract

Earlobe clefts have been the major concern for aesthetic repair in the present situation. The advent of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for enhancement of healing has never been treated for cleft earlobe repair. This study aims to compare and evaluate the efficacy of wound healing with and without platelet-rich plasma injection in bilateral earlobe cleft lobe repair. 50 patients presenting bilateral earlobe cleft were selected for this study. Earlobe repair (cross-stitch technique) was performed under local anaesthesia using 5-0 prolene sutures. On one side platelet-rich plasma was injected intra-dermally. Patient was followed up after 24 h, 8 and 15 days post-operatively for evaluation of pain and scar respectively. Statistically significant/highly significant difference seen for the values between the groups (p < 0.01, 0.05) with higher values at 8 days for group without PRP while lower values for the group with PRP, at 15 days higher values of Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) was seen for group with PRP, while lower values for the group without PRP. ELC repair using cross-stitch technique and intradermal PRP injection intra-operatively is a simple, cost effective method and gives good aesthetic results. It also promotes the healing and reduces the chances of scar formation. Length, contour and integrity of the earlobe is also maintained by this technique and this research for the first time in literature proves that such a large sample has been found effective in ELC repair with PRP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-024-05158-w.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。