Abstract
BACKGROUND: Skin defects caused by open hand trauma are difficult to treat clinically and severely affect the recovery of hand function. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been widely used in the treatment of refractory chronic wounds, but its use in hand trauma skin defects remains scarce. METHODS: This study compared the outcomes of 27 patients treated with PRP to 31 patients undergoing skin flap transplantation for hand wounds. We assessed several parameters, including healing times, duration of surgery, postoperative pain (VAS score), intraoperative amputation length, finger function, sensation restoration, nail bed preservation, and hospitalization expenses. RESULTS: PRP-treated patients showed a mean healing time of 21.59 ± 3.17 days. Surgical times were significantly shorter in the PRP group (22.04 ± 7.04 min) compared to the flap group (57.45 ± 8.15 min, P < 0.0001). PRP patients experienced longer postoperative healing times (20.15 ± 2.16 days) than those in the skin flap group (12.84 ± 1.08 days, P < 0.0001), but reported lower pain scores (1.3 ± 1.44 vs 2.55 ± 2.06, P = 0.0119). Range of Motion (ROM) at the proximal interphalangeal joint was better in the PRP group (96.26° ± 6.69) compared to the flap group (86.16° ± 15.24, P = 0.0028). Sensory outcomes favored the PRP group, with a two-point discrimination of 2.37 ± 1.34 mm versus 2.52 ± 1.27 mm in the flap group (P = 0.0274). Costs were lower in the PRP group ($2081.6 ± 258.14 vs $2680.18 ± 481.15, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: PRP treatment for skin defects from hand trauma is effective, offering advantages in terms of reduced surgical time, pain, and cost, with comparable or superior functional outcomes to flap transplantation. Despite longer healing times, PRP may represent a preferable option for open hand injuries, preserving more nail beds and resulting in better sensation and joint motion.