Dairy Barn Methane Levels and Feasibility of Thermal Catalytic Oxidation for Net Climate Benefit

奶牛场甲烷水平及热催化氧化法对气候净效益的可行性

阅读:1

Abstract

Thermal catalytic oxidation has emerged as a promising technique to destroy methane from dilute sources, such as agricultural emissions in engineered indoor environments. The concentration of methane and total volumetric treatment requirements must be understood to evaluate the feasibility of this approach, particularly with respect to economic and environmental viability. Here, dairy farm field sampling campaigns were conducted in New England dairies (free stalls with 600-1,200 head of cattle in both convection and tunnel ventilation) to establish a robust framework to evaluate the climate-benefits and cost-effectiveness associated with deployment of thermal catalytic methane oxidizers in these housing styles. Methane (CH(4)) levels ranged from 2-70 ppm in summer and 2-102 ppm in winter due to reduced ventilation during cold weather. Temperatures ranged from 24.2 to 33.3 and 3.0-15.5 °C, relative humidity (RH) ranged from 28.3 to 56.5 and 26.5-85.4% RH, and ammonia ranged from 0.0 to 6.5 and 0.0-8.0 ppm in summer and winter, respectively. Presuming a thermal catalytic reactor temperature of 400 °C and recovery of 90% of the heat generated from the methane destruction, climate beneficial operation requires a CH(4) concentration of at least 10 ppm (wind), 33 ppm (solar), 245 ppm (grid), and 140 ppm (natural gas) for a 100-year GWP. At a reactor temperature of 400 °C and 100 ppm of CH(4), the energy cost alone per tonne of CO(2)e removal would be $591, $425, and $173 for solar, wind, and biogas energy, respectively, and over $10,000 for both grid and natural gas. The use of onsite biogas provided a net climate benefit at all methane concentrations and operating temperatures due to the destruction credit from manure-derived fuel. However, the large dairy barn air flow rates (250 cfm cow(-1) in winter and 2,000 cfm cow(-1) in summer) translate to high power requirements (9-74 MW), challenging the practical implementation of renewable energy sources. This highlights the steep challenge associated with postrelease enteric methane destruction.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。