Abstract
Objective:
Monitoring endogenous platelets during intravital microscopy often involves two approaches: fluorescently labeled antibodies or genetic models of platelet-specific fluorescent protein expression. Due to limited data available on platelet functional changes induced by these methods, we compared functional effects of these methods on platelets.
Methods:
Platelet aggregation to collagen and thrombin, and collagen matrix-mediated platelet adhesion/aggregation under flow were tested. We assessed platelets from mice expressing EYFP on platelets (Cre(+)), littermate controls (Cre(-)), C57BL/6 mice, and platelets from vehicle control and x-488 treatment. We utilized intravital microscopy to monitor platelets in vivo using Cre(+) mice and x-488 treatment.
Results:
Both genetic and antibody-based approaches yielded substantial platelet-specific fluorescence. Platelets from Cre(+) and Cre(-) mice behaved similarly in aggregation and adhesion/aggregation under flow. However, they exhibited significantly enhanced aggregation and higher adhesion/aggregation as compared to platelets from C57BL/6 mice. Compared to vehicle control, x-488 platelet labeling did not induce significant functional changes in vitro. Both methods of platelet labeling provided satisfactory platelet detectability in vivo.
Conclusions:
x-488 antibody labeling of platelets induced less alteration of platelet function than genetic approaches under our experimental conditions and seems more suitable for monitoring of endogenous platelets.