Abstract
The prevailing formalisms for isolating individual polarization effects from the experimental Mueller matrix M can be broadly divided into two categories; decomposition of M to derive the individual optical effects and directly associating the individual optical effects to specific elements of M (i.e., non-decomposition techniques). Mueller matrix transformation (MMT) and direct interpretation of Mueller matrix (DIMM) are two popular techniques of the latter category. In this study, these two non-decomposition techniques (i.e., MMT and DIMM) are compared in a detailed quantitative analysis comprising of tissues (n = 53) and phantom (n = 45) samples. In particular, two commonly investigated polarimetric variables (i.e., depolarization and retardance) were calculated from the experimentally measured M using both the non-decomposition (i.e., MMT and DIMM) techniques. The comparison carried out with scatter plots (integrated with the correlation coefficients), violin plots and Bland and Altman plots revealed better agreement of depolarization-related variables (as compared to the retardance) between the two non-decomposition techniques. The comparative analyses presented here would be beneficial for the interpretation of polarimetric variables and optical characterization of turbid media.