Abstract
BACKGROUND: Co-creation offers a promising approach to public health innovation, particularly for tackling complex issues. However, the lack of a standardized methodology limits its reliability and reproducibility, especially across diverse contexts. This study explores co-creation methods used by researchers and practitioners, aiming to shed light on their implications for public health. Understanding this methodological landscape can enhance the effective implementation of co-creation processes to address complex challenges. METHODS: Utilizing the Systematic Methods Overview approach, we examined co-creation methods. Data were gathered from the Health CASCADE Co-Creation Database and grey literature using an artificial intelligence-assisted recursive search strategy and a two-step screening process. We conducted textual, comparative, and bibliometric analyses to evaluate methodological underpinnings and relationships between methods. RESULTS: Analysis of 2,627 academic articles and grey literature sources identified over 900 co-creation methods. While surveys, focus groups, and group discussions were prevalent, participatory methods were underutilized. Notably, 91.3% of methods co-occurred, with a predominant combination of qualitative approaches. Furthermore, a significant discrepancy between research and practice was evident, with only 10.2% convergence. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a critical gap between co-creation in research and practice, emphasizing the need to bridge this methodological divide for advancing co-creation as a reliable approach in public health. The over-reliance on qualitative methods raises concerns about tokenistic engagement and undermines meaningful public participation in co-creation. Addressing this trend is vital to preserve the essence of true co-creation and maximize its potential for addressing complex public health challenges. KEY MESSAGES: • Mapping the diverse methods of co-creation in public health reveals both richness and disparities in approach, from surveys to participatory methods. • Addressing the discrepancy between co-creation in research and practice is vital for establishing a reliable and effective approach to tackling public health challenges.